z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A randomised comparison of bilateral recession versus unilateral recession-resection as surgery for infantile esotropia
Author(s) -
Jan Roelof Polling,
Marinus J.C. Eijkemans,
J. Esser,
U Gilles,
G. Kolling,
Eduard Schulz,
Birgit Lorenz,
P. Roggenkämper,
Volker Herzau,
Alina A. Zubcov,
M.P.M. ten Tusscher,
D. WittebolPost,
Gabriele C. Gusek-Schneider,
J.R.M. Cruysberg,
Huibert J. Simonsz
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
british journal of ophthalmology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.016
H-Index - 153
eISSN - 1468-2079
pISSN - 0007-1161
DOI - 10.1136/bjo.2008.149658
Subject(s) - medicine , strabismus , esotropia , strabismus surgery , surgery , randomized controlled trial , binocular vision , ophthalmology , optics , physics
Infantile esotropia, a common form of strabismus, is treated either by bilateral recession (BR) or by unilateral recession-resection (RR). Differences in degree of alignment achieved by these two procedures have not previously been examined in a randomised controlled trial.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom