English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In 2011 Matwin et al published a letter to JAMIA entitled ‘Performance of SVM and Bayesian classifiers on the systematic review classification task’.1 This letter continued a discussion on the relative benefits of using support vector machine (SVM) and Bayesian techniques for performing systematic reviews.2–4 In particular, it was suggested that the running time of algorithms must be taken into consideration when comparing their performances as it becomes very important for large datasets.Following up on this idea, we attempted to directly compare the performance of a Bayesian method with the SVM algorithm used by Cohen in his original work.4 The same SVM system (SVMlight5) with the same parameters as was …

Direct comparison between support vector machine and multinomial naive Bayes algorithms for medical abstract classification