z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A review of observations and models of dynamic topography
Author(s) -
Nicolas Flament,
Michael Gurnis,
R. Dietmar Müller
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
lithosphere
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.737
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1941-8264
pISSN - 1947-4253
DOI - 10.1130/l245.1
Subject(s) - lithosphere , geology , bathymetry , ocean surface topography , mantle (geology) , amplitude , crust , geophysics , residual , hotspot (geology) , wavelength , seismology , geodesy , tectonics , oceanography , physics , optoelectronics , algorithm , quantum mechanics , computer science
The topography of Earth is primarily controlled by lateral differences in the density structure of the crust and lithosphere. In addition to this isostatic topography, flow in the mantle induces deformation of its surface leading to dynamic topography. This transient deformation evolves over tens of millions of years, occurs at long wavelength, and is relatively small ( 5000 km), we show that there is good agreement between published residual topography fields, including the one described here, and present-day dynamic topography predicted from mantle flow models, including a new one. Residual and predicted fields show peak-to-peak amplitudes of roughly ±2 km and a dominant degree two pattern with high values for the Pacific Ocean, southern Africa, and the North Atlantic and low values for South America, western North America, and Eurasia. The flooding of continental interiors has long been known to require both larger amplitudes and to be temporally phase-shifted compared with inferred eustatic changes. Such long-wavelength inferred vertical motions have been attributed to dynamic topography. An important consequence of dynamic topography is that long-term global sea-level change cannot be estimated at a single passive margin. As a case study, we compare the results of three published models and of our model to the subsidence history of well COST-B2 offshore New Jersey. The <400 ± 45 m amount of anomalous subsidence of this well since 85 Ma is best explained by models that predict dynamic subsidence of the New Jersey margin during that period. Explicitly including the lithosphere in future global mantle flow models should not only facilitate such comparisons between model results and data, but also further constrain the nature of the coupling between the mantle and the lithosphere.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom