Timing of recovery from the end-Permian extinction: Geochronologic and biostratigraphic constraints from south China: COMMENT AND REPLY: REPLY
Author(s) -
Daniel J. Lehrmann,
Jahandar Ramezani,
Samuel A. Bowring,
M. W. Martin,
Paul Montgomery,
Paul Enos,
Jonathan L. Payne,
Michael J. Orchard,
Hongmei Wang,
Jiayong Wei
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
geology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.609
H-Index - 215
eISSN - 1943-2682
pISSN - 0091-7613
DOI - 10.1130/g23941y.1
Subject(s) - geology , permian , paleontology , extinction event , permian–triassic extinction event , china , extinction (optical mineralogy) , archaeology , history , demography , sociology , biological dispersal , population , structural basin
[Bucher et al.'s Comment (2007)][1] questioned the validity of our 247.2 Ma age estimate for the Early-Middle Triassic (Olenekian-Anisian, O-A) boundary based on a comparison of recent data from Lower Guandao section presented by us ([Lehrmann et al., 2006][2]) with preliminary data reported from
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom