Open AccessA Double-Strand Break in a Chromosomal LINE Element Can Be Repaired by Gene Conversion with Various Endogenous LINE Elements in Mouse Cells
Author(s) -
Annie Tremblay,
Maria Jasin,
Pascal Chartrand
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
molecular and cellular biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.14
H-Index - 327
eISSN - 1067-8824
pISSN - 0270-7306
DOI - 10.1128/mcb.20.1.54-60.2000
Subject(s) - biology , genome , homology directed repair , homologous recombination , genetics , homologous chromosome , genome instability , gene , dna , gene conversion , sister chromatids , dna repair , endonuclease , retrotransposon , chromosome , dna damage , transposable element , dna mismatch repair
A double-strand break (DSB) in the mammalian genome has been shown to be a very potent signal for the cell to activate repair processes. Two different types of repair have been identified in mammalian cells. Broken ends can be rejoined with or without loss or addition of DNA or, alternatively, a homologous template can be used to repair the break. For most genomic sequences the latter event would involve allelic sequences present on the sister chromatid or homologous chromosome. However, since more than 30% of our genome consists of repetitive sequences, these would have the option of using nonallelic sequences for homologous repair. This could have an impact on the evolution of these sequences and of the genome itself. We have designed an assay to look at the repair of DSBs in LINE-1 (L1) elements which number 105 copies distributed throughout the genome of all mammals. We introduced into the genome of mouse epithelial cells an L1 element with an I-Sce I endonuclease site. We induced DSBs at the I-Sce I site and determined their mechanism of repair. We found that in over 95% of cases, the DSBs were repaired by an end-joining process. However, in almost 1% of cases, we found strong evidence for repair involving gene conversion with various endogenous L1 elements, with some being used preferentially. In particular, the TF family and the L1Md-A2 subfamily, which are the most active in retrotransposition, appeared to be contributing the most in this process. The degree of homology did not seem to be a determining factor in the selection of the endogenous elements used for repair but may be based instead on accessibility. Considering their abundance and dispersion, gene conversion between repetitive elements may be occurring frequently enough to be playing a role in their evolution.