z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of the Parasight Platform for Malaria Diagnosis
Author(s) -
Yochay Eshel,
Ar Houri-Yafin,
Hagai Benkuzari,
Natalie Lezmy,
Mamta Soni,
Malini Charles,
Jayanthi Swaminathan,
Hilda Solomon,
Pavithra Sampathkumar,
Zul Premji,
Caroline Mbithi,
Zaitun Nneka,
Simon Onsongo,
Daniel Maina,
Sarah Levy-Schreier,
Caitlin Lee Cohen,
Dan Glück,
Joseph Joel Pollak,
Seth J. Salpeter
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of clinical microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.349
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1070-633X
pISSN - 0095-1137
DOI - 10.1128/jcm.02155-16
Subject(s) - malaria , plasmodium falciparum , plasmodium vivax , kenya , diagnostic test , diagnosis of malaria , medicine , rapid diagnostic test , biology , veterinary medicine , pathology , ecology
The World Health Organization estimates that nearly 500 million malaria tests are performed annually. While microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are the main diagnostic approaches, no single method is inexpensive, rapid, and highly accurate. Two recent studies from our group have demonstrated a prototype computer vision platform that meets those needs. Here we present the results from two clinical studies on the commercially available version of this technology, the Sight Diagnostics Parasight platform, which provides malaria diagnosis, species identification, and parasite quantification. We conducted a multisite trial in Chennai, India (Apollo Hospital [ n = 205]), and Nairobi, Kenya (Aga Khan University Hospital [ n = 263]), in which we compared the device to microscopy, RDTs, and PCR. For identification of malaria, the device performed similarly well in both contexts (sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 100% at the Indian site and sensitivity of 99.3% and specificity of 98.9% at the Kenyan site, compared to PCR). For species identification, the device correctly identified 100% of samples with Plasmodium vivax and 100% of samples with Plasmodium falciparum in India and 100% of samples with P. vivax and 96.1% of samples with P. falciparum in Kenya, compared to PCR. Lastly, comparisons of the device parasite counts with those of trained microscopists produced average Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.84 at the Indian site and 0.85 at the Kenyan site.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom