
Direct Ertapenem Disk Screening Method for Identification of KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in Surveillance Swab Specimens
Author(s) -
Karen Lolans,
Karen Calvert,
Sarah Won,
James Clark,
Mary K. Hayden
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of clinical microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.349
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1070-633X
pISSN - 0095-1137
DOI - 10.1128/jcm.01988-09
Subject(s) - macconkey agar , klebsiella pneumoniae , ertapenem , microbiology and biotechnology , imipenem , escherichia coli , biology , agar , medicine , bacteria , antibiotics , antibiotic resistance , biochemistry , genetics , gene
Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) production in Gram-negative bacilli is an increasing problem worldwide. Rectal swab surveillance is recommended as a component of infection prevention programs, yet few screening methods are published. We compared detection of KPC-producingKlebsiella pneumoniae andEscherichia coli in surveillance specimens by 2 methods: (i) inoculation of swabs in tryptic soy broth containing 2 μg/ml imipenem followed by plating to MacConkey agar (MAC) (method 1) and (ii) streaking swabs on MAC onto which a 10-μg ertapenem disk was then placed (method 2). Simulated rectal swab specimens of challenge isolates from a collection of well-characterizedK. pneumoniae andE. coli strains and salvage rectal swab specimens collected from patients at 4 different health care facilities over a 7-month period were tested. The gold-standard comparator wasbla KPC PCR testing of isolates. Method 1 detected 4/9 (44%) KPC-positive challenge isolates. By method 2, 9/9 KPC-positive challenge isolates exhibited zones of inhibition of ≤27 mm; all KPC-negative isolates exhibited zones of inhibition greater than 27 mm. The sensitivity and specificity of method 1 for detection of KPC-positiveK. pneumoniae andE. coli in 149 rectal swab specimens were 65.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.8% to 80.8%) and 49.6% (95% CI, 40.3% to 58.9%), respectively. With method 2, a zone diameter of ≤27 mm had a sensitivity of 97.0% (95% CI, 82.5% to 99.8%) and specificity of 90.5% (95% CI, 83.3% to 94.9%) for detection of KPC in rectal swab specimens. Direct ertapenem disk testing is simpler, more sensitive, and more specific than selective broth enrichment with imipenem for detection of KPC-producingK. pneumoniae andE. coli in surveillance specimens.