z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Controlled Comparison of BacT/Alert MB System, Manual Myco/F Lytic Procedure, and Isolator 10 System for Diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Bacteremia
Author(s) -
John A. Crump,
Anne B. Morrissey,
Habib O. Ramadhani,
Boniface Njau,
Venance P. Maro,
L. Barth Reller
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of clinical microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.349
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1070-633X
pISSN - 0095-1137
DOI - 10.1128/jcm.01035-11
Subject(s) - lytic cycle , bacteremia , mycobacterium tuberculosis , isolator , tuberculosis , microbiology and biotechnology , mycobacterium , virology , medicine , isolation (microbiology) , biology , pathology , antibiotics , virus , electronic engineering , engineering
We compared the performance of the BacT/Alert MB system, that of the manual Bactec Myco/F Lytic procedure, and that of the Isolator 10 lysis-centrifugation system in the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteremia. Mean times to detection were 16.4 days for BacT/Alert MB versus 20.0 days for Myco/F Lytic, 16.5 days for BacT/Alert MB versus 23.8 days for Isolator 10, and 21.1 days for Bactec Myco/F Lytic versus 22.7 days for Isolator 10. There were no significant differences in yields. The mean (range) magnitude of mycobacteremia was 30.0 (0.4, 90.0) CFU/ml and was correlated with the time to positivity in the BacT/Alert MB system (r = -0.4920). M. tuberculosis bacteremia was detected more rapidly in a continuously monitored liquid blood culture system, but the mean time to positivity exceeded 3 weeks.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom