z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Parallel Evaluation of the MALDI Sepsityper and Verigene BC-GN Assays for Rapid Identification of Gram-Negative Bacilli from Positive Blood Cultures
Author(s) -
Miguel A. Arroyo,
Gerald A. Denys
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of clinical microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.349
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1070-633X
pISSN - 0095-1137
DOI - 10.1128/jcm.00692-17
Subject(s) - bacilli , blood culture , clinical microbiology , microbiology and biotechnology , medicine , matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization , gram positive cocci , gram positive bacteria , bacteremia , biology , antimicrobial , bacteria , antibiotics , chemistry , staphylococcus aureus , genetics , organic chemistry , adsorption , desorption
Rapid identification of microorganisms from positive blood cultures has improved clinical management and antimicrobial stewardship. The advent of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has reduced the time to identification of cultured isolates and is now often the definitive method used in the clinical microbiology laboratory. The commercialin vitro diagnostic MALDI Sepsityper (Sepsityper) kit has the potential for standardization and clinical routine use for the rapid identification of a broad range of bacteria from positive blood cultures. In this study, we performed a parallel evaluation of the Sepsityper (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA) and the Verigene BC-GN (BC-GN) assays (Nanosphere, Inc., Northfield, IL) for the identification of Gram-negative bacilli. A total of 210 Bactec bottles demonstrating Gram-negative bacilli were prospectively enrolled for this study. Among these, 200 monomicrobial cultures were included in the comparative analysis. For monomicrobial cultures, the BC-GN detected 85% (170/200) compared to that detected by routine culture while the Sepsityper detected 94% (188/200) and 91% (181/200) to the genus and species levels, respectively. Comparable positive percentage agreement and negative percentage agreement were observed between the Sepsityper (96.5% and 98.8%, respectively) and the BC-GN (99.4% and 99.8%, respectively) when only (n = 170, 85%) organisms targeted by the latter test were included in the analysis. In conclusion, the two methods evaluated in this study showed excellent performance characteristics for the identification of Gram-negative bacilli commonly isolated from blood cultures. The Sepsityper showed a broader identification range capability that may further improve clinical management and antimicrobial stewardship in patients with less frequent Gram-negative bacilli bloodstream infections.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom