
Analysis of Promoter Recognition In Vivo Directed by ς F of Bacillus subtilis by Using Random-Sequence Oligonucleotides
Author(s) -
Edward I Amaya,
Anastasia Khvorova,
Patrick J. Piggot
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of bacteriology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.652
H-Index - 246
eISSN - 1067-8832
pISSN - 0021-9193
DOI - 10.1128/jb.183.12.3623-3630.2001
Subject(s) - biology , bacillus subtilis , rna polymerase , promoter , consensus sequence , transcription (linguistics) , genetics , gene , microbiology and biotechnology , sigma factor , dna , lac operon , recognition sequence , oligonucleotide , rna , gene expression , bacteria , peptide sequence , restriction enzyme , linguistics , philosophy
Formation of spores from vegetative bacteria by Bacillus subtilis is a primitive system of cell differentiation. Critical to spore formation is the action of a series of sporulation-specific RNA polymerase sigma factors. Of these, sigma(F) is the first to become active. Few genes have been identified that are transcribed by RNA polymerase containing sigma(F) (E-sigma(F)), and only two genes of known function are exclusively under the control of E-sigma(F), spoIIR and spoIIQ. In order to investigate the features of promoters that are recognized by E-sigma(F), we studied the effects of randomizing sequences for the -10 and -35 regions of the promoter for spoIIQ. The randomized promoter regions were cloned in front of a promoterless copy of lacZ in a vector designed for insertion by double crossover of single copies of the promoter-lacZ fusions into the amyE region of the B. subtilis chromosome. This system made it possible to test for transcription of lacZ by E-sigma(F) in vivo. The results indicate a weak sigma(F)-specific -10 consensus, GG/tNNANNNT, of which the ANNNT portion is common to all sporulation-associated sigma factors, as well as to sigma(A). There was a rather stronger -35 consensus, GTATA/T, of which GNATA is also recognized by other sporulation-associated sigma factors. The looseness of the sigma(F) promoter requirement contrasts with the strict requirement for sigma(A)-directed promoters of B. subtilis. It suggests that additional, unknown, parameters may help determine the specificity of promoter recognition by E-sigma(F) in vivo.