z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Complex Regulation of Urease Formation from the Two Promoters of the ure Operon of Klebsiella pneumoniae
Author(s) -
Qiong Liu,
R. Bender
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of bacteriology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.652
H-Index - 246
eISSN - 1067-8832
pISSN - 0021-9193
DOI - 10.1128/jb.01096-06
Subject(s) - urease , operon , klebsiella pneumoniae , promoter , biology , transcription (linguistics) , lac operon , urea , nitrogen , biochemistry , gene , enzyme , microbiology and biotechnology , chemistry , gene expression , escherichia coli , linguistics , philosophy , organic chemistry
Klebsiella pneumoniae can use urea as the sole source of nitrogen, thanks to a urease encoded by theureDABCEFG operon. Expression of this operon is independent of urea and is regulated by the supply of nitrogen in the growth medium. When cells were growth rate limited for nitrogen, the specific activity of urease was about 70 times higher than that in cells grown under conditions of excess nitrogen. Much of this nitrogen regulation of urease formation depended on the nitrogen regulatory system acting through the nitrogen assimilation control protein, NAC. In a strain deleted for thenac gene, nitrogen limitation resulted in only a 7-fold increase in the specific activity of urease, in contrast to the 70-fold increase seen in that of the wild type. Theure operon was transcribed from two promoters. The proximal promoter (P1) had an absolute requirement for NAC; little or no transcription was seen in the absence of NAC. The distal promoter (P2) was independent of NAC, but its activity increased about threefold when the growth rate of the cells was limited by the nitrogen source. Transcriptional regulation of P1 and P2 accounted for most of the changes in urease activity seen under various nitrogen conditions. However, when transcription ofureDABCEFG was less than 20% of its maximum, the amount of active urease formed per transcript ofure decreased almost linearly with decreasing transcription. This may reflect a defect in the assembly of active urease and accounted for as much as a threefold activity difference under the conditions tested here. Thus, theure operon was transcribed from a NAC-independent promoter (P2) and the most strongly NAC-dependent promoter known (P1). Most of the regulation of urease formation was transcriptional, but whenure transcription was low, assembly of active urease also was defective.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here