z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Transcription Activation by the DNA-Binding Domain of the AraC Family Protein RhaS in the Absence of Its Effector-Binding Domain
Author(s) -
Jason R. Wickstrum,
Jeff M. Skredenske,
Ana Kolin,
Ding Jun Jin,
Jianwen Fang,
Susan M. Egan
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of bacteriology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.652
H-Index - 246
eISSN - 1067-8832
pISSN - 0021-9193
DOI - 10.1128/jb.00530-07
Subject(s) - ctd , biology , transcription (linguistics) , transcription factor , binding site , dna , microbiology and biotechnology , dna binding protein , effector , dna binding domain , promoter , gene , genetics , gene expression , philosophy , linguistics , oceanography , geology
TheEscherichia coli l -rhamnose-responsive transcription activators RhaS and RhaR both consist of two domains, a C-terminal DNA-binding domain and an N-terminal dimerization domain. Both function as dimers and only activate transcription in the presence ofl -rhamnose. Here, we examined the ability of the DNA-binding domains of RhaS (RhaS-CTD) and RhaR (RhaR-CTD) to bind to DNA and activate transcription. RhaS-CTD and RhaR-CTD were both shown by DNase I footprinting to be capable of binding specifically to the appropriate DNA sites. In vivo as well as in vitro transcription assays showed that RhaS-CTD could activate transcription to high levels, whereas RhaR-CTD was capable of only very low levels of transcription activation. As expected, RhaS-CTD did not require the presence ofl -rhamnose to activate transcription. The upstream half-site atrhaBAD and the downstream half-site atrhaT were found to be the strongest of the known RhaS half-sites, and a new putative RhaS half-site with comparable strength to known sites was identified. Given that cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP), the second activator required for fullrhaBAD expression, cannot activaterhaBAD expression in a ΔrhaS strain, it was of interest to test whether CRP could activate transcription in combination with RhaS-CTD. We found that RhaS-CTD allowed significant activation by CRP, both in vivo and in vitro, although full-length RhaS allowed somewhat greater CRP activation. We conclude that RhaS-CTD contains all of the determinants necessary for transcription activation by RhaS.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here