Open Access
Molecular Damage and Induction of Proinflammatory Cytokines in Human Endothelial Cells Exposed to Shiga Toxin 1, Shiga Toxin 2, and α-Sarcin
Author(s) -
Maurizio Brigotti,
Domenica Carnicelli,
Elisa Ravanelli,
Antonio González Vara,
Chiara Martinelli,
Roberta Alfieri,
Pier Giorgio Petronini,
Piero Sestili
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
infection and immunity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.508
H-Index - 220
eISSN - 1070-6313
pISSN - 0019-9567
DOI - 10.1128/iai.01707-06
Subject(s) - proinflammatory cytokine , biology , shiga toxin , microbiology and biotechnology , virulence , biochemistry , gene , immunology , inflammation
Treatment of human endothelial cells with Shiga toxin 1 and 2 leads to the upregulation of genes encoding proinflammatory molecules involved in the pathogenesis of hemolytic-uremic syndrome. The paradoxical effect of inhibitors of mRNA translation, such as Shiga toxins, that at the same time induce protein expression was investigated by studying the relationship between their enzymatic activity (abstraction of adenine from nucleic acids) and the induction of interleukin-8 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in human endothelial cells. As a positive control, the fungal toxin alpha-sarcin, acting on the same rRNA sequence targeted by Shiga toxins with a different mechanism (RNase activity), was used. The three toxins caused ribosomal lesions that, in turn, induced the activation of p38 stress kinase with kinetics that paralleled the inhibition of translation. Alpha-sarcin was devoid of activity on DNA. Shiga toxin 2 targeted nuclear DNA with more rapid kinetics than did Shiga toxin 1. Since the fungal ribotoxin was fully effective in the induction of proinflammatory proteins, we conclude that damage to ribosomes is indispensable and sufficient to activate protein expression via induction of the stress-kinase cascade. However, gene upregulation events induced by Shiga toxin 2 were much more efficient than those triggered by Shiga toxin 1, although the two toxins impaired translation to the same extent and had overlapping time courses of stress kinase activation. Regulations independent of the ribotoxic stress were assumed to operate in intoxicated cells. We hypothesized that the two bacterial toxins recognize different DNA sequences inducing different regulating effects on gene expression.