
Optimization of Meropenem Minimum Concentration/MIC Ratio To Suppress In Vitro Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Author(s) -
Vincent H. Tam,
Amy N. Schilling,
Shádi Neshat,
Keith Poole,
David Melnick,
Elizabeth A. Coyle
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.07
H-Index - 259
eISSN - 1070-6283
pISSN - 0066-4804
DOI - 10.1128/aac.49.12.4920-4927.2005
Subject(s) - meropenem , pseudomonas aeruginosa , microbiology and biotechnology , tobramycin , minimum inhibitory concentration , population , antibacterial agent , biology , drug resistance , bacteria , pseudomonadaceae , antibiotics , chemistry , antibiotic resistance , medicine , genetics , environmental health
Suppression of resistance in a densePseudomonas aeruginosa population has previously been shown with optimized quinolone exposures. However, the relevance to β-lactams is unknown. We investigated the bactericidal activity of meropenem and its propensity to suppressP. aeruginosa resistance in an in vitro hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Two isogenic strains ofP. aeruginosa (wild type and an AmpC stably derepressed mutant [MIC = 1 mg/liter]) were used. An HFIM inoculated with approximately 1 × 108 CFU/ml of bacteria was subjected to various meropenem exposures. Maintenance doses were given every 8 h to simulate the maximum concentration achieved after a 1-g dose in all regimens, but escalating unbound minimum concentrations (C mi n s) were simulated with different clearances. Serial samples were obtained over 5 days to quantify the meropenem concentrations, the total bacterial population, and subpopulations with reduced susceptibilities to meropenem (>3× the MIC). For both strains, a significant bacterial burden reduction was seen with all regimens at 24 h. Regrowth was apparent after 3 days, with theC min /MIC ratio being ≤1.7 (time above the MIC, 100%). Selective amplification of subpopulations with reduced susceptibilities to meropenem was suppressed with aC min /MIC of ≥6.2 or by adding tobramycin to meropenem (C min /MIC = 1.7). Investigations that were longer than 24 h and that used high inocula may be necessary to fully evaluate the relationship between drug exposures and the likelihood of resistance suppression. These results suggest that theC min /MIC of meropenem can be optimized to suppress the emergence of non-plasmid-mediatedP. aeruginosa resistance. Our in vitro data support the use of an extended duration of meropenem infusion for the treatment of severe nosocomial infections in combination with an aminoglycoside.