
Impact of Novel Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Reverse Transcriptase Mutations P119S and T165A on 4′-Ethynylthymidine Analog Resistance Profile
Author(s) -
Guangwei Yang,
Elijah Paintsil,
Ginger E. Dutschman,
Susan P. Grill,
Chuan-Jen Wang,
Jimin Wang,
Hiromichi Tanaka,
Takayuki Hamasaki,
Masanori Baba,
YungChi Cheng
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.07
H-Index - 259
eISSN - 1070-6283
pISSN - 0066-4804
DOI - 10.1128/aac.00686-09
Subject(s) - reverse transcriptase , virology , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , virus , biology , lentivirus , genetics , viral disease , rna , gene
2′,3′-Didehydro-3′-deoxy-4′-ethynylthymidine (4′-Ed4T), a derivative of stavudine (d4T), has potent activity against human immunodeficiency virus and is much less inhibitory to mitochondrial DNA synthesis and cell growth than its progenitor, d4T. 4′-Ed4T triphosphate was a better reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor than d4T triphosphate, due to the additional binding of the 4′-ethynyl group at a presumed hydrophobic pocket in the RT active site. Previous in vitro selection for 4′-Ed4T-resistant viral strains revealed M184V and P119S/T165A/M184V mutations on days 26 and 81, respectively; M184V and P119S/T165A/M184V conferred 3- and 130-fold resistance to 4′-Ed4T, respectively. We investigated the relative contributions of these mutations, engineered into the strain NL4-3 background, to drug resistance, RT activity, and viral growth. Viral variants with single RT mutations (P119S or T165A) did not show resistance to 4′-Ed4T; however, M184V and P119S/T165A/M184V conferred three- and fivefold resistance, respectively, compared with that of the wild-type virus. The P119S/M184V and T165A/M184V variants showed about fourfold resistance to 4′-Ed4T. The differences in the growth kinetics of the variants were not more than threefold. The purified RT of mutants with the P119S/M184V and T165A/M184V mutations were inhibited by 4′-Ed4TTP with 8- to 13-fold less efficiency than wild-type RT. M184V may be the primary resistance-associated mutation of 4′-Ed4T, and P119S and T165A are secondary mutations. On the basis of our findings and the results of structural modeling, a virus with a high degree of resistance to 4′-Ed4T (e.g., more than 50-fold resistance) will be difficult to develop. The previously observed 130-fold resistance of the virus with P119S/T165A/M184V to 4′-Ed4T may be partly due to mutations both in the RT sequence and outside the RT sequence.