Face masks effectively limit the probability of SARS-CoV-2 transmission
Author(s) -
Yafang Cheng,
Nan Ma,
Christian Witt,
Steffen Rapp,
Philipp S. Wild,
Meinrat O. Andreae,
Ulrich Pöschl,
Hang Su
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 12.556
H-Index - 1186
eISSN - 1095-9203
pISSN - 0036-8075
DOI - 10.1126/science.abg6296
Subject(s) - face masks , covid-19 , masking (illustration) , transmission (telecommunications) , airborne transmission , pandemic , medicine , social distance , limit (mathematics) , coronavirus , virology , computer science , medical emergency , outbreak , mathematics , telecommunications , disease , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , art , mathematical analysis , visual arts
Airborne transmission by droplets and aerosols is important for the spread of viruses. Face masks are a well-established preventive measure, but their effectiveness for mitigating SARS-CoV-2 transmission is still under debate. We show that variations in mask efficacy can be explained by different regimes of virus abundance and related to population-average infection probability and reproduction number. For SARS-CoV-2, the viral load of infectious individuals can vary by orders of magnitude. We find that most environments and contacts are under conditions of low virus abundance (virus-limited) where surgical masks are effective at preventing virus spread. More advanced masks and other protective equipment are required in potentially virus-rich indoor environments including medical centers and hospitals. Masks are particularly effective in combination with other preventive measures like ventilation and distancing.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom