The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C
Author(s) -
Ove HoeghGuldberg,
Daniela Jacob,
Michael A. Taylor,
Tania Guillén Bolaños,
Marco Bindi,
Sally Brown,
Inés Camilloni,
Arona Diédhiou,
Riyanti Djalante,
Kristie L. Ebi,
François Engelbrecht,
Joël Guiot,
Yasuaki Hijioka,
Shagun Mehrotra,
Chris Hope,
A. J. Payne,
HansOtto Pörtner,
Sonia I. Seneviratne,
Adelle Thomas,
Rachel Warren,
Guangsheng Zhou
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 12.556
H-Index - 1186
eISSN - 1095-9203
pISSN - 0036-8075
DOI - 10.1126/science.aaw6974
Subject(s) - climate change , livelihood , natural resource economics , global warming , limiting , agriculture , political economy of climate change , ecosystem , ecological forecasting , environmental resource management , climate science , environmental science , geography , ecology , economics , mechanical engineering , archaeology , engineering , biology
Increased concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases have led to a global mean surface temperature 1.0°C higher than during the pre-industrial period. We expand on the recent IPCC Special Report on global warming of 1.5°C and review the additional risks associated with higher levels of warming, each having major implications for multiple geographies, climates, and ecosystems. Limiting warming to 1.5°C rather than 2.0°C would be required to maintain substantial proportions of ecosystems and would have clear benefits for human health and economies. These conclusions are relevant for people everywhere, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where the escalation of climate-related risks may prevent the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom