Response to Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science” | Zendy

Christopher Anderson | Zendy; Štěpán Bahník | Zendy; Michael BarnettCowan | Zendy; Frank A. Bosco | Zendy; Jesse Chandler | Zendy; Christopher R. Chartier | Zendy; Felix Cheung | Zendy; Cody D. Christopherson | Zendy; Andreas Cordes | Zendy; Edward Cremata | Zendy; Nicolás Della Penna | Zendy; Vivien Estel | Zendy; Anna Fedor | Zendy; Stanka A. Fitneva | Zendy; Michael C. Frank | Zendy; James A. Grange | Zendy; Joshua K. Hartshorne | Zendy; Fred Hasselman | Zendy; Felix Henninger | Zendy; Marije van der Hulst | Zendy; Kai J. Jonas | Zendy; Calvin K. Lai | Zendy; Carmel Levitan | Zendy; Jeremy K. Miller | Zendy; Katherine Sledge Moore | Zendy; Johannes Meixner | Zendy; Marcus R. Munafò | Zendy; Koen Ilja Neijenhuijs | Zendy; Gustav Nilsonne | Zendy; Brian A. Nosek | Zendy; Franziska Plessow | Zendy; Jason M. Prenoveau | Zendy; Ashley A. Ricker | Zendy; Kathleen Schmidt | Zendy; Jeffrey R. Spies | Zendy; Stefan Stieger | Zendy; Nina Strohminger | Zendy; Gavin Brent Sullivan | Zendy; Robbie C. M. van Aert | Zendy; Marcel A. L. M. van Assen | Zendy; Wolf Vanpaemel | Zendy; Michelangelo Vianello | Zendy; Martin Voracek | Zendy; Kellylynn Zuni | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Response to Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”

Author(s) -

Christopher Anderson,

Štěpán Bahník,

Michael BarnettCowan,

Frank A. Bosco,

Jesse Chandler,

Christopher R. Chartier,

Felix Cheung,

Cody D. Christopherson,

Andreas Cordes,

Edward Cremata,

Nicolás Della Penna,

Vivien Estel,

Anna Fedor,

Stanka A. Fitneva,

Michael C. Frank,

James A. Grange,

Joshua K. Hartshorne,

Fred Hasselman,

Felix Henninger,

Marije van der Hulst,

Kai J. Jonas,

Calvin K. Lai,

Carmel Levitan,

Jeremy K. Miller,

Katherine Sledge Moore,

Johannes Meixner,

Marcus R. Munafò,

Koen Ilja Neijenhuijs,

Gustav Nilsonne,

Brian A. Nosek,

Franziska Plessow,

Jason M. Prenoveau,

Ashley A. Ricker,

Kathleen Schmidt,

Jeffrey R. Spies,

Stefan Stieger,

Nina Strohminger,

Gavin Brent Sullivan,

Robbie C. M. van Aert,

Marcel A. L. M. van Assen,

Wolf Vanpaemel,

Michelangelo Vianello,

Martin Voracek,

Kellylynn Zuni

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

science

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 12.556

H-Index - 1186

eISSN - 1095-9203

pISSN - 0036-8075

DOI - 10.1126/science.aad9163

Subject(s) - reproducibility , pessimism , psychological science , psychology , psychological research , open science , statistics , social psychology , mathematics , epistemology , philosophy

Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research