z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees
Author(s) -
Ben A. Woodcock,
James M. Bullock,
Richard F. Shore,
Matthew S. Heard,
M. Glória Pereira,
John W. Redhead,
Lucy E. Ridding,
Hannah Dean,
D. Sleep,
Peter A. Henrys,
Jodey Peyton,
Sarah Hulmes,
Lucy Hulmes,
Miklós Sárospataki,
Christoph Saure,
Mike Edwards,
Elke Genersch,
Silvio Knäbe,
Richard F. Pywell
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 12.556
H-Index - 1186
eISSN - 1095-9203
pISSN - 0036-8075
DOI - 10.1126/science.aaa1190
Subject(s) - neonicotinoid , pollinator , biology , honey bee , toxicology , pesticide , agrochemical , insect , pollination , pollen , ecology , agriculture , imidacloprid
Neonicotinoid seed dressings have caused concern world-wide. We use large field experiments to assess the effects of neonicotinoid-treated crops on three bee species across three countries (Hungary, Germany, and the United Kingdom). Winter-sown oilseed rape was grown commercially with either seed coatings containing neonicotinoids (clothianidin or thiamethoxam) or no seed treatment (control). For honey bees, we found both negative (Hungary and United Kingdom) and positive (Germany) effects during crop flowering. In Hungary, negative effects on honey bees (associated with clothianidin) persisted over winter and resulted in smaller colonies in the following spring (24% declines). In wild bees ( Bombus terrestris and Osmia bicornis ), reproduction was negatively correlated with neonicotinoid residues. These findings point to neonicotinoids causing a reduced capacity of bee species to establish new populations in the year following exposure.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom