z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Ethics and Genomic Incidental Findings
Author(s) -
Amy L. McGuire,
Steven Joffe,
Barbara A. Koenig,
Barbara B. Biesecker,
Laurence B. McCullough,
Jennifer S. BlumenthalBarby,
Timothy Caulfield,
Sharon F. Terry,
Robert C. Green
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 12.556
H-Index - 1186
eISSN - 1095-9203
pISSN - 0036-8075
DOI - 10.1126/science.1240156
Subject(s) - obligation , psychology , medicine , computational biology , biology , political science , law
The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recently issued a statement (1) recommending that all laboratories conducting clinical sequencing seek and report pathogenic and expected pathogenic mutations for a short list of carefully chosen genes and conditions. The recommendations establish a baseline for reporting clinically relevant incidental findings and articulate ethical principles relevant to their disclosure. The ACMG acknowledged that the list will evolve over time and is developing a mechanism for community input (2). This paper focuses on the ethical framework for the recommendations, rather than on the choice of which genes to include on the list.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom