Comment on "Post-Wildfire Logging Hinders Regeneration and Increases Fire Risk"
Author(s) -
B. N. Baird
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 12.556
H-Index - 1186
eISSN - 1095-9203
pISSN - 0036-8075
DOI - 10.1126/science.1127481
Subject(s) - logging , sampling (signal processing) , regeneration (biology) , environmental science , nothing , forestry , archaeology , geography , engineering , biology , philosophy , filter (signal processing) , microbiology and biotechnology , electrical engineering , epistemology
Based on limited sampling 2 years after the 2002 Biscuit Fire in Oregon, Donato et al. (Brevia, 20 January 2006, p. 352) concluded that postfire logging reduced seedling regeneration by 71%. Analysis of the study methodology and raw data suggest that this estimate is statistically flawed and misleading and says nothing about the impacts of more prompt postfire harvest.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom