Leveling the cost and carbon footprint of circular polymers that are chemically recycled to monomer
Author(s) -
Nemi Vora,
Peter R. Christensen,
Jérémy Demarteau,
Nawa Raj Baral,
Jay D. Keasling,
Brett A. Helms,
Corinne D. Scown
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
science advances
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.928
H-Index - 146
ISSN - 2375-2548
DOI - 10.1126/sciadv.abf0187
Subject(s) - monomer , carbon footprint , polymer , commodity chemicals , commodity , footprint , carbon fibers , pulp and paper industry , chemical engineering , materials science , environmental science , process engineering , chemistry , organic chemistry , business , composite material , greenhouse gas , engineering , catalysis , geology , paleontology , composite number , oceanography , finance
Mechanical recycling of polymers downgrades them such that they are unusable after a few cycles. Alternatively, chemical recycling to monomer offers a means to recover the embodied chemical feedstocks for remanufacturing. However, only a limited number of commodity polymers may be chemically recycled, and the processes remain resource intensive. We use systems analysis to quantify the costs and life-cycle carbon footprints of virgin and chemically recycled polydiketoenamines (PDKs), next-generation polymers that depolymerize under ambient conditions in strong acid. The cost of producing virgin PDK resin using unoptimized processes is ~30-fold higher than recycling them, and the cost of recycled PDK resin ($1.5 kg -1 ) is on par with PET and HDPE, and below that of polyurethanes. Virgin resin production is carbon intensive (86 kg CO 2 e kg -1 ), while chemical recycling emits only 2 kg CO 2 e kg -1 This cost and emissions disparity provides a strong incentive to recover and recycle future polymer waste.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom