English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Maaz . argue that inconsistencies across scales of observation undermine our working hypothesis that soil NO  emissions have been substantially overlooked in California; however, the core issues they raise are already discussed in our manuscript. We agree that point measurements cannot be reliably used to estimate statewide soil NO  emissions-the principal motivation behind our new modeling/airplane approach. Maaz .'s presentation of fertilizer-based emission factors (a nonmechanistic scaling of point measures to regions based solely on estimated nitrogen fertilizer application rates) includes no data from California or other semiarid sites, and does not explicitly account for widely known controls of climate, soil, and moisture on soil NO  fluxes. In contrast, our model includes all of these factors. Finally, the fertilizer sales data that Maaz . highlight are known to suffer from serious errors and do not offer a logically more robust pathway for spatial analysis of NO  emissions from soil.

Extrapolation of point measurements and fertilizer-only emission factors cannot capture statewide soil NO x emissions

Extrapolation of point measurements and fertilizer-only emission factors cannot capture statewide soil NO _x emissions