Is the Quest for Signaling Bias Worth the Effort?
Author(s) -
Terry Kenakin
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
molecular pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.469
H-Index - 198
eISSN - 1521-0111
pISSN - 0026-895X
DOI - 10.1124/mol.117.111187
Subject(s) - proposition , in vivo , resource (disambiguation) , value (mathematics) , attrition , in vitro , process (computing) , biology , computational biology , computer science , medicine , machine learning , genetics , computer network , philosophy , dentistry , epistemology , operating system
The question of whether signaling bias is a viable discovery strategy for drug therapy is discussed as a value proposition. On the positive side, bias is easily identified and quantified in simple in vitro functional assays with little resource expenditure. However, there are valid pharmacological reasons why these in vitro bias numbers may not accurately translate to in vivo therapeutic systems making the expectation of direct correspondence of in vitro bias to in vivo systems a problematic process. Presently, in vitro bias is used simply as a means to identify unique molecules to be advanced to more complex therapeutic assays but from this standpoint alone, the value proposition lies far to the positive. However, pharmacological attention needs to be given to the translational gap to reduce inevitable and costly attrition in biased molecule progression.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom