z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of multi-microphone probes and estimation methods for pressure-based acoustic intensity
Author(s) -
Michael T. Rose,
Reese D. Rasband,
Kent L. Gee,
Scott D. Sommerfeldt
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
proceedings of meetings on acoustics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
ISSN - 1939-800X
DOI - 10.1121/2.0000787
Subject(s) - sound intensity , microphone , anechoic chamber , acoustics , intensity (physics) , loudspeaker , sound intensity probe , bandwidth (computing) , sound pressure , microphone array , broadband , estimator , wavelength , optics , physics , materials science , computer science , sound power , mathematics , telecommunications , critical distance , statistics , sound (geography)
Acoustic intensity measurements made with multi-microphone probes traditionally use cross-spectral processing methods to estimate pressure and particle velocity. Bias errors become significant as the microphone separation becomes comparable with the acoustic wavelength. However, it has been shown that the phase and gradient estimator (PAGE) method increases probe bandwidth without modifying microphone spacing [Thomas et al. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 137, 3366-3376 (2015)]. In this study, acoustic intensity is estimated by both the PAGE method and the traditional method across two three-dimensional (3D) intensity probes and three 2D intensity probes. Probe performance is compared in the far field of a broadband noise-radiating loudspeaker located in an anechoic chamber. The results show increased frequency bandwidth using the PAGE method across all probe designs. For 3D probes, intensity level errors were least with a spherical probe. For the 2D probes, the accuracy of intensity level and direction estimates increased with the separation distance of the microphones.Acoustic intensity measurements made with multi-microphone probes traditionally use cross-spectral processing methods to estimate pressure and particle velocity. Bias errors become significant as the microphone separation becomes comparable with the acoustic wavelength. However, it has been shown that the phase and gradient estimator (PAGE) method increases probe bandwidth without modifying microphone spacing [Thomas et al. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 137, 3366-3376 (2015)]. In this study, acoustic intensity is estimated by both the PAGE method and the traditional method across two three-dimensional (3D) intensity probes and three 2D intensity probes. Probe performance is compared in the far field of a broadband noise-radiating loudspeaker located in an anechoic chamber. The results show increased frequency bandwidth using the PAGE method across all probe designs. For 3D probes, intensity level errors were least with a spherical probe. For the 2D probes, the accuracy of intensity level and direction estimates inc...

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom