z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Three-microphone probe bias errors for acoustic intensity and specific acoustic impedance
Author(s) -
Joseph S. Lawrence,
Eric B. Whiting,
Kent L. Gee,
Reese D. Rasband,
Tracianne B. Neilsen,
Scott D. Sommerfeldt
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the journal of the acoustical society of america
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.619
H-Index - 187
eISSN - 1520-8524
pISSN - 0001-4966
DOI - 10.1121/1.5022688
Subject(s) - microphone , acoustics , sound intensity , acoustic impedance , intensity (physics) , amplitude , electrical impedance , sound pressure , physics , materials science , optics , sound (geography) , ultrasonic sensor , quantum mechanics
In acoustic intensity estimation, adding a microphone at the probe center removes errors associated with pressure averaging. Analytical bias errors are presented for a one-dimensional, three-microphone probe for active intensity, reactive intensity, and specific acoustic impedance in a monopole field. Traditional estimation is compared with the Phase and Amplitude Gradient Estimator (PAGE) method; the PAGE method shows an increased bandwidth for all three quantities. The two- and three-microphone methods are compared experimentally, showing reduced bias errors with three-microphone PAGE for active and reactive intensity, whereas using two microphones is preferred for specific acoustic impedance.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom