z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Personal and situational variables associated with wind turbine noise annoyance
Author(s) -
David S. Michaud,
Stephen E. Keith,
Katya Feder,
Sonia A. Voicescu,
Leonora Marro,
John Than,
Mireille Guay,
Tara Bower,
Allison Denning,
Éric Lavigne,
Chantal Whelan,
Sabine A. Janssen,
Tony Leroux,
Frits van den Berg
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the journal of the acoustical society of america
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.619
H-Index - 187
eISSN - 1520-8524
pISSN - 0001-4966
DOI - 10.1121/1.4942390
Subject(s) - annoyance , confidence interval , situational ethics , noise (video) , turbine , psychology , social psychology , acoustics , medicine , statistics , audiology , mathematics , computer science , physics , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics) , thermodynamics , loudness
The possibility that wind turbine noise (WTN) affects human health remains controversial. The current analysis presents results related to WTN annoyance reported by randomly selected participants (606 males, 632 females), aged 18-79, living between 0.25 and 11.22 km from wind turbines. WTN levels reached 46 dB, and for each 5 dB increase in WTN levels, the odds of reporting to be either very or extremely (i.e., highly) annoyed increased by 2.60 [95% confidence interval: (1.92, 3.58), p < 0.0001]. Multiple regression models had R(2)'s up to 58%, with approximately 9% attributed to WTN level. Variables associated with WTN annoyance included, but were not limited to, other wind turbine-related annoyances, personal benefit, noise sensitivity, physical safety concerns, property ownership, and province. Annoyance was related to several reported measures of health and well-being, although these associations were statistically weak (R(2 )< 9%), independent of WTN levels, and not retained in multiple regression models. The role of community tolerance level as a complement and/or an alternative to multiple regression in predicting the prevalence of WTN annoyance is also provided. The analysis suggests that communities are between 11 and 26 dB less tolerant of WTN than of other transportation noise sources.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom