Differences in short-term training for interaural phase difference discrimination between two different forced-choice paradigms | Zendy

Andrew King | Zendy; Kathryn Hopkins | Zendy; Christopher J. Plack | Zendy

Open Access

Differences in short-term training for interaural phase difference discrimination between two different forced-choice paradigms

Author(s) -

Andrew King,

Kathryn Hopkins,

Christopher J. Plack

Publication year - 2013

Publication title -

the journal of the acoustical society of america

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.619

H-Index - 187

eISSN - 1520-8524

pISSN - 0001-4966

DOI - 10.1121/1.4819116

Subject(s) - two alternative forced choice , interval (graph theory) , term (time) , significant difference , phase difference , duration (music) , audiology , phase (matter) , mathematics , psychology , statistics , acoustics , medicine , physics , combinatorics , quantum mechanics

Improvement in interaural phase difference (IPD) discrimination over 2 to 3 h was compared for two two-alternative forced-choice paradigms: A three-interval paradigm, in which the IPD was in interval two or three, and a paradigm with two intervals of four stimuli in which the IPD was in the second and fourth stimuli of one interval (AAAA vs ABAB). The difference in performance between the beginning and end of the testing period was smaller for the two-interval paradigm, supporting the use of this paradigm for fast measurement of discrimination thresholds without the need for a long period of training.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research