z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reflection orders and auditory distance
Author(s) -
Catarina Mendonça,
João Lamas,
Tom Barker,
Guilherme Campos,
Paulo Dias,
Ville Pulkki,
Carlos Silva,
Jorge A. Santos
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
proceedings of meetings on acoustics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
ISSN - 1939-800X
DOI - 10.1121/1.4800186
Subject(s) - loudness , reverberation , reflection (computer programming) , critical distance , acoustics , sound (geography) , parallax , perception , computer science , mathematics , physics , artificial intelligence , psychology , sound power , neuroscience , programming language
The perception of sound distance has been sparsely studied so far. It is assumed to depend on familiar loudness, reverberation, sound spectrum, and parallax, but most of these factors have never been carefully addressed. Reverberation has been mostly analyzed in terms of ratio between direct and indirect sound, and total duration. Here we were interested in assessing the impact of each reflection order on distance localization. We compared sound source discrimination at an intermediate and at a distant location with direct sound only, one, two, three, and four reflection orders in a 2AFC task. At the intermediate distances, normalized psychophysical curves reveal no differentiation between direct sound and up to three reflection orders, but sounds with four reflection orders have significantly lower thresholds. For the distant sources, sounds with four reflection orders yielded the best discrimination slopes, but there was also a clear benefit for sounds with three reflection orders. We discuss the result...

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom