z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Experimentally elicited productions: Differences and similarities between mixed effects and ANOVA analyses
Author(s) -
Matthew Goldrick
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
proceedings of meetings on acoustics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
ISSN - 1939-800X
DOI - 10.1121/1.4793583
Subject(s) - categorical variable , normality , variance (accounting) , analysis of variance , mixed design analysis of variance , variation (astronomy) , repeated measures design , mixed model , econometrics , computer science , statistics , speech production , speech recognition , psychology , mathematics , physics , accounting , astrophysics , business
Currently, many experimental studies of speech production use fully counterbalanced designs to examine variation in categorical (e.g., correct/incorrect) or relatively continuous measures (e.g., reaction times, voice onset times). These data present several challenges to ANOVA analyses. Some of these issues are well known to be the speech community; for example, the non-normality of dependent variables such as proportion correct. Others have been less extensively addressed; for example, many speech studies account for participant- but not item-specific contributions to variance. I’ll discuss the opportunities and challenges in using linear mixed effects models to address these issues. I’ll review some of the common issues that arise in using such models and discuss how to interpret and report their results.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom