English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

An explicit second‐order finite‐difference scheme has been used to solve the elastic‐wave equation in the time domain. Solutions are presented for the perfect wedge, the lossless penetrable wedge, and the plane parallel waveguide that have been proposed as benchmarks by the Acoustical Society of America. Good agreement with reference solutions is obtained if the media is discretized at 20 gridpoints per wavelength. There is a major discrepancy (up to 20 dB) in reference‐source level because the reference solutions are normalized to the source strength at 1 m in the model, but the finite‐difference solutions are normalized to the source strength at 1 m in a homogeneous medium. The finite‐difference method requires computational times between 10 and 20 h on a super minicomputer without an array processor. The method has the advantage of providing phase information and, when run for a pulse source, of providing insight into the evolution of the wave field and energy partitioning. More complex models, includi...

Solutions to range-dependent benchmark problems by the finite-difference method