z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Why are natural sounds detected faster than pips?
Author(s) -
Clara Suied,
Patrick Susini,
Stephen McAdams,
Roy D. Patterson
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
the journal of the acoustical society of america
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.619
H-Index - 187
eISSN - 1520-8524
pISSN - 0001-4966
DOI - 10.1121/1.3310196
Subject(s) - natural sounds , tone (literature) , acoustics , envelope (radar) , natural (archaeology) , computer science , white noise , speech recognition , bioacoustics , noise (video) , artificial intelligence , physics , biology , telecommunications , art , paleontology , radar , literature , image (mathematics)
Simple reaction times (RTs) were used to measure differences in processing time between natural animal sounds and artificial sounds. When the artificial stimuli were sequences of short tone pulses, the animal sounds were detected faster than the artificial sounds. The animal sounds were then compared with acoustically modified versions (white noise modulated by the temporal envelope of the animal sounds). No differences in RTs were observed between the animal sounds and their modified counterparts. These results show that the fast detection observed for natural sounds, in the present task, could be explained by their acoustic properties.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom