English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Research involving the perceived pitch (tonality) [M. M. Peterson and C. W. Asp, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 52, S146 (1972) and C. W. Asp, J. S. Berry, and C. S. Bessell, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 64, S20 (1978)] and optimal octaves in phoneme perception [E. E. McKenney and C. W. Asp, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 51, S122 (1972) and R. M. Miner and J. L. Danhauer, J. Am. Audiol. Soc. 2, 163–168 (1977)] has supported the notion that phonemes may be “frequency specific.” For these studies, homogeneously grouped phonemes were selected according to a pitch model [C. W. Asp, J. S. Berry, and C. S. Bessell, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 64, S20 (1978)]. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of homogeneously and heterogeneously grouping phonemes according to the pitch model. This included pairing a low /m/, a middle /l/, and a high /s/ consonant each with a low /u/, a middle /a/, and a high /i/ vowel. This resulted in three homogeneous (i.e., /mu, la, and si/) and seven heterogeneous (i.e., /ma, mi, lu, li, su, and sa/) nonsense syllables. Ten normal‐hearing young adult listeners selected the syllable with the highest pitch in each pair within a paired‐comparison paradigm. Results indicated that (1) the nonsense syllables could be ranked from high to low perceived pitch (i.e., /si, li, sa, mi, la, su, ma, lu, and mu/); (2) both consonants and vowels affected the listeners' judgments, although vowels appeared to have a greater effect; and (3) the rank order of the perceived pitch of the nonsense syllables was in agreement with past research. Tonality is discussed in terms of acoustic data as well as a mathematical perceptual model for predicting the pitch perception of phonemes in syllables and in words.Research involving the perceived pitch (tonality) [M. M. Peterson and C. W. Asp, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 52, S146 (1972) and C. W. Asp, J. S. Berry, and C. S. Bessell, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 64, S20 (1978)] and optimal octaves in phoneme perception [E. E. McKenney and C. W. Asp, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 51, S122 (1972) and R. M. Miner and J. L. Danhauer, J. Am. Audiol. Soc. 2, 163–168 (1977)] has supported the notion that phonemes may be “frequency specific.” For these studies, homogeneously grouped phonemes were selected according to a pitch model [C. W. Asp, J. S. Berry, and C. S. Bessell, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 64, S20 (1978)]. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of homogeneously and heterogeneously grouping phonemes according to the pitch model. This included pairing a low /m/, a middle /l/, and a high /s/ consonant each with a low /u/, a middle /a/, and a high /i/ vowel. This resulted in three homogeneous (i.e., /mu, la, and si/) and seven heterogeneous (i.e., ...

Perceived pitch (tonality) of nonsense syllables with phonemes homogeneously or heterogeneously grouped phonemes according to a pitch model