English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Parameters representing smoothed spectral characteristics of short segments of speech are often used as features in speech processing systems. The main pattern recognition problem in speech is matching the test spectrum with the reference spectrum. In this paper we show that the matching methods usually adopted do not yield a true measure of the actual differences in the envelopes of spectra. This is particularly true for additive type of noise degradation in speech. Two types of such degradation namely, the quantization noise of waveform encoding and additive bandlimited white noise, are considered for illustration. We show that the parameters, linear prediction coefficients or cepstral coefficients, do not represent the true spectral envelope information of the distorted signal, which explains the discrepancy among various distance measures based on these parameters. We propose a more practical approach which involves transforming one spectrum relative to the other to bring both of them to the same level of dynamic range before any comparison is made between them. The main result of this study is that quantization distortion of ADPCM speech is not very significant even at low bit rates, whereas additive white noise is deleterious even for high signal to noise ratio. This result explains to some extent the good recognition capability of Harpy speech recognition system for ADPCM speech even for the lowest bit rate [B. Yegnanarayana and D. Raj Reddy, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62, S27 (A)].

Comparison of speech spectra for additive type spectral distortion