z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of image quality assessment algorithms on compressed images
Author(s) -
Christophe Charrier,
Kenneth Knoblauch,
Anush K. Moorthy,
Alan C. Bovik,
Laurence T. Maloney
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
proceedings of spie, the international society for optical engineering/proceedings of spie
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.192
H-Index - 176
eISSN - 1996-756X
pISSN - 0277-786X
DOI - 10.1117/12.840221
Subject(s) - image quality , measure (data warehouse) , computer science , image (mathematics) , image compression , artificial intelligence , quality (philosophy) , compression (physics) , data compression , algorithm , pattern recognition (psychology) , scaling , perception , computer vision , image processing , mathematics , data mining , philosophy , materials science , geometry , epistemology , composite material , neuroscience , biology
International audienceA crucial step in image compression is the evaluation of its performance, and more precisely the available way to measure the nal quality of the compressed image. Usually, to measure performance, some measure of the covariation between the subjective ratings and the degree of compression is performed between rated image quality and algorithm. Nevertheless, local variations are not well taken into account.We use the recently introduced Maximum Likelihood Di erence Scaling (MLDS) method to quantify supra-threshold perceptual di erences between pairs of images and examine how perceived image quality estimated through MLDS changes the compression rate is increased. This approach circumvents the limitations inherent to subjective rating methods

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom