Surface energy effects on the self-assembly of epitaxial quantum dots
Author(s) -
Lawrence H. Friedman
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
proceedings of spie, the international society for optical engineering/proceedings of spie
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.192
H-Index - 176
eISSN - 1996-756X
pISSN - 0277-786X
DOI - 10.1117/12.809796
Subject(s) - surface energy , epitaxy , phase diagram , planar , condensed matter physics , materials science , crystal (programming language) , wetting , surface (topology) , facet (psychology) , quantum dot , surface stress , acicular , specific surface energy , strain energy , chemical physics , crystallography , phase (matter) , physics , nanotechnology , chemistry , thermodynamics , quantum mechanics , geometry , mathematics , microstructure , computer science , layer (electronics) , computer graphics (images) , psychology , social psychology , big five personality traits , programming language , personality , finite element method
Epitaxial self-assembled quantum dots (SAQDs) result from Stranski-Krastanow growth whereby epitaxial 3D islands form spontaneously on a planar thin film. Common systems are GexSi1−x/Si and InxGa1−xAs/GaAs. SAQDs are typically grown on a (001) surface. The formation and evolution of SAQDs is governed in large part by the interaction of surface energy and elastic strain; however, the surface energy density is quite complicated and not well understood. Many growth processes take place at high temperature where stress and entropy effects can have a profound effect on the surface free energy. There are three competing theories of the nature of the planar (001) surface: I. It is a stable crystal facet. II. It is a stable non-faceted surface. III. It is an unstable crystal antifacet. Each leads to a different theory of the SAQD formation process. The first theory appears most often in modeling literature, but the second two theories take explicit account of the discrete nature of a crystal surface. Existing observational and theoretical evidence in support of and against these theories is reviewed. Then a simple statistical mechanics model is presented that yields a phase-diagram depicting when each of the three theories is valid. Finally, the Solid-on-Solid model of crystal surfaces is used to validate the proposed phase diagram and to calculate the orientation and height dependence of the surface free energy that is expressed as a wetting chemical potential, a wetting modulus and surface tilt moduli.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom