Influence of mask surface processing on CD-SEM imaging
Author(s) -
Marc Hauptmann,
Lukas M. Eng,
Jan Richter
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
proceedings of spie, the international society for optical engineering/proceedings of spie
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.192
H-Index - 176
eISSN - 1996-756X
pISSN - 0277-786X
DOI - 10.1117/12.793106
Subject(s) - chromium , materials science , repeatability , photomask , electron , secondary electrons , scanning electron microscope , lithography , secondary emission , resist , yield (engineering) , oxide , optoelectronics , optics , analytical chemistry (journal) , layer (electronics) , nanotechnology , chemistry , composite material , physics , metallurgy , chromatography , quantum mechanics
Photomask processing during mask manufacturing can influence key-parameters of CD-SEM measurement such as measurement accuracy and repeatability. In particular, resist strip and mask clean processes seriously affect the surface properties of CoG-reticles and therefore increase the chrome-CD-measurement uncertainty. In extreme cases, the change of chemo-physical properties of the top Chromium oxide layer can have dramatically impact on the electrons emitted by the surface, utilized by the imaging process of CD SEMs. This change leads to a decreased secondary electron yield, and even more dramatic, induces charging near isolated chromium structures. Although the surface changes appear to be reversible with typical charge decay times in the order of days, the associated charging effect is in severe conflict to the common demand for low cycle times and high measurement accuracy experiments for theCD-measurement processes. In this work, we present fundamental experiments on Chromium oxide layers taking into account the effect of hydrophilicity on the optical as well as on the electrical behavior. We observe that the dependence of secondary electron yield on primary electron energy turns out to be the main issue effecting charging ofelectrically floating chromium structures. This charging effect thus can be understood in terms of shifting the so-called “iso-electrical point”, ultimately resulting in contrast reversion. Furthermore, our data are compared to a simple model respecting electron induced charging during mask surface activation. Our model is supported by numerical calculations of the effective surface potentials near isolated chromium structures. Moreover, the model provides ways to find novel routes for improved surface preparation prior to CD-measurement that allow a good SEM imaging behavior.status: publishe
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom