An analysis of double exposure lithography options
Author(s) -
Saul Lee,
Jeffrey D. Byers,
Kane Jen,
Paul Zimmerman,
Bryan J. Rice,
Nicholas J. Turro,
C. Grant Willson
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
proceedings of spie, the international society for optical engineering/proceedings of spie
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.192
H-Index - 176
eISSN - 1996-756X
pISSN - 0277-786X
DOI - 10.1117/12.773030
Subject(s) - photolithography , lithography , process window , materials science , process (computing) , optoelectronics , computer science , nanotechnology , operating system
The current optical photolithography technology is approaching the physical barrier to the minimum achievable feature size. To produce smaller devices, new resolution enhancement technologies must be developed. Double exposure lithography has shown promise as potential pathway that is attractive because it is much cheaper than double patterning lithography and it can be deployed on existing imaging tools. However, this technology is not possible without the development of new materials with nonlinear response to exposure dose. The performance of existing materials such as reversible contrast enhancement layers (rCELs) and theoretical materials such as in- termediate state two-photon (ISTP) and optical threshold layer (OTL) materials in double exposure applications was investigated through computer simulation. All three materials yielded process windows in double exposure mode. OTL materials showed the largest process window (DOF 0.137 µm, EL 5.06 %). ISTP materials had the next largest process window (DOF 0.124 µm, EL 3.22 %) followed by the rCEL (0.105 µm, 0.58 %). This study is an analysis of the feasibility of using the materials in double exposure mode.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom