z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Numerical Investigation of Cavitation-Regimes in a Converging-Diverging Nozzle
Author(s) -
Polina Gorkh,
Steffen J. Schmidt,
Nikolaus A. Adams
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
asme press ebooks
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Book series
DOI - 10.1115/1.861851_ch145
Subject(s) - cavitation , inviscid flow , mechanics , nozzle , inertia , compressibility , shock wave , jet (fluid) , condensation , compressible flow , materials science , rotational symmetry , shock (circulatory) , mach number , flow (mathematics) , physics , classical mechanics , thermodynamics , medicine
In the present study the authors analyze cavitation dynamics, instabilities and detachment mechanisms in an axisymmetric converging-diverging nozzle. Numerical simulation is used to investigate a recent experiment. Following the experimental setup, three operating points are simulated to identify two different cloud detachment mechanisms: re-entrant jet and condensation shock. A homogeneous mixture model is applied to model cavitating two-phase flows. Pure liquid and liquid-vapor mixtures are both treated as fully compressible substances to enable the computation of propagating pressure waves into the liquid bulk. Because the study focuses on inertia-dominated mechanisms, the flow is modeled as inviscid. Our numerical simulation predicts a slightly different cavitation behavior than the one published for the reference experiment. We observe a high-frequency shedding that generates vapor pockets inside the channel. These vapor pockets partially collapse but frequently they integrate into a large coherent structure. Once a coherent vapor cloud reaches a sufficient length, it detaches and is advected downstream. As a result, the total vapor volume fraction shows a low frequency oscillation which is about one order slower than the shedding frequency. Two detachment mechanisms are present during one cycle: the re-entrant jet for shorter cavities and the condensation shock for longer cavities. The maximum cavity length is not constant but features significant cycle-to-cycle variation. Even a slight difference in the cavitation number leads to a difference in the detachment mechanisms: the lower cavitation number leads to a bubbly shock as the dominant detachment mechanism, while for a higher cavitation number shock-driven detachment occurs only once per cycle.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom