Comparison of Thin Film Heat Flux Gauge Technologies Emphasizing Continuous-Duration Operation
Author(s) -
Shawn Siroka,
Reid A. Berdanier,
Karen A. Thole,
Kam Chana,
C. W. Haldeman,
Richard Anthony
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of turbomachinery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.972
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1528-8900
pISSN - 0889-504X
DOI - 10.1115/1.4045991
Subject(s) - heat flux , mechanical engineering , calibration , thermal mass , nuclear engineering , computer science , heat transfer , materials science , aerospace engineering , thermal , engineering , mechanics , physics , meteorology , quantum mechanics
Thin-film heat flux gauges (HFGs) have been used for decades to measure surface temperatures and heat flux in test turbines with the majority being used in facilities that are short-duration. These gauges are typically composed of two resistive temperature devices deposited on opposing sides of a dielectric. However, because these sensors have been traditionally applied for measurements in transient-type facilities, the challenges facing adaptation of this technology for a steady facility warrant investigation. These challenges are highlighted, and the solutions are presented throughout the paper. This paper describes the nanofabrication process for heat flux gauges and a new calibration method to address the potential deterioration of gauges over long runtimes in continuous-duration facilities. Because the primary uncertainty of these sensors arises from the ambiguity of the thermal properties, the emphasis is placed on the property determination. Also, this paper presents a discussion on the use of impulse response theory to process the data showing the feasibility of the method for steady-duration facilities after an initial settling time. The latter portion of the paper focuses on comparing well-established heat flux gauges developed for short-duration turbine test facilities to recently developed gauges fabricated using modern nanofabrication techniques for a continuous turbine test facility. The gauges were compared using the test case of an impinging jet over a range of Reynolds numbers. The comparison between the PSU gauge and the reference device indicated agreement within 14%, and similar results were achieved through comparison with established sensors from partner institutions.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom