z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Installed Performance Assessment of an Array of Distributed Propulsors Ingesting Boundary Layer Flow
Author(s) -
Chana Goldberg,
Devaiah Nalianda,
Panagiotis Laskaridis,
Pericles Pilidis
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of engineering for gas turbines and power
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.567
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1528-8919
pISSN - 0742-4795
DOI - 10.1115/1.4038837
Subject(s) - airframe , propulsion , propulsor , thrust , boundary layer , boundary layer suction , fuel efficiency , aerospace engineering , propulsive efficiency , marine engineering , engineering , flow (mathematics) , flow separation , mechanical engineering , automotive engineering , boundary layer control , mechanics , physics
Conventional propulsion systems are typically represented as uninstalled system to suit the simple separation between airframe and engine in a podded configuration. However, boundary layer ingesting systems are inherently integrated, and require a different perspective for performance analysis. Simulations of boundary layer ingesting propulsions systems must represent the change in inlet flow characteristics which result from different local flow conditions. In addition, a suitable accounting system is required to split the airframe forces from the propulsion system forces. The research assesses the performance of a conceptual vehicle which applies a boundary layer ingesting propulsion system NASA’s N3-X blended wing body aircraft as a case study. The performance of the aircraft’s distributed propulsor array is assessed using a performance method which accounts for installation terms resulting from the boundary layer ingesting nature of the system. A ‘thrust split’ option is considered which splits the source of thrust between the aircraft’s main turbojet engines and the distributed propulsor array. An optimum thrust split for a specific fuel consumption at design point is found to occur for a thrust split value of 94.1%. In comparison, the optimum thrust split with respect to fuel consumption for the design 7500 nmi mission is found to be 93.6%, leading to a 1.5% fuel saving for the configuration considered. ∗Address all correspondence to this author.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom