Experimentally Infused Plant and Controller Optimization Using Iterative Design of Experiments—Theoretical Framework and Airborne Wind Energy Case Study
Author(s) -
Nihar Deodhar,
Joseph Deese,
Christopher Vermillion
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of dynamic systems measurement and control
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1528-9028
pISSN - 0022-0434
DOI - 10.1115/1.4037014
Subject(s) - turbine , controller (irrigation) , iterative method , iterative design , tower , computer science , control theory (sociology) , design of experiments , point (geometry) , energy (signal processing) , aerospace engineering , simulation , mathematical optimization , algorithm , engineering , mathematics , structural engineering , agronomy , control (management) , artificial intelligence , biology , statistics , geometry , scheduling (production processes)
This research presents an iterative framework for optimizing the plant and controller for complex systems by fusing expensive but valuable experiments with cheap yet less accurate simulations. At each iteration, G-optimal design is used to generate experiments and simulations within a prescribed design space that is shrunken in size after each successful iteration. The shrinking of the design space is determined through statistical characterization of a response surface model, and further shrinking is achieved at successive iterations through a numerical model correction factor that is driven by the results of experiments. An initial validation of this iterative design optimization framework was performed on an airborne wind energy (AWE) system, where tethers and an aerostat are used in place of a tower to elevate the turbine to high altitudes. Using a unique lab-scale setup for the experiments, the aforementioned iterative methodology was used to optimize the center of mass location and pitch angle set point for the airborne wind energy system. The optimum configuration yielded a substantial improvement in system responses as compared to a numerically optimized configuration. The framework was recently extended to include four variables (horizontal and vertical stabilizer areas, center of mass location, and pitch angle set point).
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom