z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Fluid–Structure Interaction Simulation of Vortex-Induced Vibration of a Flexible Hydrofoil
Author(s) -
Abe H. Lee,
Robert L. Campbell,
Brent A. Craven,
Stephen A. Hambric
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of vibration and acoustics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.605
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1528-8927
pISSN - 1048-9002
DOI - 10.1115/1.4036453
Subject(s) - reynolds averaged navier–stokes equations , computational fluid dynamics , fluid–structure interaction , turbulence , detached eddy simulation , mechanics , finite element method , large eddy simulation , vortex shedding , vortex , reynolds number , cylinder , propeller , physics , structural engineering , engineering , mechanical engineering , marine engineering
Fluid–structure interaction (FSI) is investigated in this study for vortex-induced vibration (VIV) of a flexible, backward skewed hydrofoil. An in-house finite element structural solver finite element analysis nonlinear (FEANL) is tightly coupled with the open-source computational fluid dynamics (CFD) library openfoam to simulate the interaction of a flexible hydrofoil with vortical flow structures shed from a large upstream rigid cylinder. To simulate the turbulent flow at a moderate computational cost, hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes–large eddy simulation (RANS–LES) is used. Simulations are first performed to investigate key modeling aspects that include the influence of CFD mesh resolution and topology (structured versus unstructured mesh), time-step size, and turbulence model (delayed-detached-eddy-simulation and k−ω shear stress transport-scale adaptive simulation). Final FSI simulations are then performed and compared against experimental data acquired from the Penn State-ARL 12 in water tunnel at two flow conditions, 2.5 m/s and 3.0 m/s, corresponding to Reynolds numbers of 153,000 and 184,000 (based on the cylinder diameter), respectively. Comparisons of the hydrofoil tip-deflections, reaction forces, and velocity fields (contours and profiles) show reasonable agreement between the tightly coupled FSI simulations and experiments. The primary motivation of this study is to assess the capability of a tightly coupled FSI approach to model such a problem and to provide modeling guidance for future FSI simulations of rotating propellers in crashback (reverse propeller operation).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom