An Argument Against Augmenting the Lagrangean for Nonholonomic Systems
Author(s) -
Carlos M. Roithmayr,
Dewey H. Hodges
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of applied mechanics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.69
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1528-9036
pISSN - 0021-8936
DOI - 10.1115/1.3086435
Subject(s) - nonholonomic system , constraint (computer aided design) , equations of motion , motion (physics) , dynamical systems theory , euler equations , mathematics , argument (complex analysis) , basis (linear algebra) , computer science , classical mechanics , mathematical analysis , physics , robot , geometry , artificial intelligence , mobile robot , biochemistry , chemistry , quantum mechanics
Although it is known that correct dynamical equations of motion for a nonholonomic system cannot be obtained from a Lagrangean that has been augmented with a sum of the nonholonomic constraint equations weighted with multipliers, previous publications suggest otherwise. An example has been proposed in support of augmentation and purportedly demonstrates that an accepted method fails to produce correct equations of motion whereas augmentation leads to correct equations; this paper shows that in fact the opposite is true. The correct equations, previously discounted on the basis of a flawed application of the Newton-Euler method, are verified by using Kane's method and a new approach to determining the directions of constraint forces. A correct application of the Newton-Euler method reproduces valid equations.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom