English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the Conclusion section of the above article its authors wro ‘‘ . . . contrary to the weeping hypothesis, however, the curr analysis demonstrates that @after load is applied # lubricant fluid trapped between a rigid impermeable surface and a por permeable cartilage layer flows monotonically into the cartila during contact creep; no fluid flow from the cartilage into t lubricant pool is observe d . . . . @T#his result is in better agreemen with the premise of the boosted lubrication theory of Walker et @1#’’ The article gives the duration of ‘‘contact creep’’ as .4 secon for roughness similar to that of cartilage @2# and about 10 second for roughness 5 times as tall and 10 times longer in wavelen

journal of biomechanical engineering

Comment on “Hydrostatic Pressurization and Depletion of Trapped Lubricant Pool During Creep Contact of a Rippled Indenter Against a Biphasic Articular Cartilage Layer”, [Stoltz, M. A., Basalo I. M., and Ateshian, G. A., 2003, J. Biomech. Eng. 125, pp. 585–593.]