The influence of three different instrumentation techniques on the incidence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment.
Author(s) -
Gianluca Gambarini,
Luca Testarelli,
Michele De Luca,
Milana,
Gianluca Plotino,
Nicola M. Grande,
Rubini Ag,
Al Sudani D,
Gianpaolo Sannino
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
pubmed
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1824-0852
DOI - 10.11138/ads.0152
Subject(s) - reciprocating motion , medicine , dentistry , molar , visual analogue scale , premolar , postoperative pain , pulpectomy , orthodontics , surgery , computer science , bearing (navigation) , artificial intelligence
Apical extrusion of infected debris to the periradicular tissues is one of the principal causes of postoperative pain and discomfort. Recent researches have shown that reciprocating instrumentation techniques seem to significantly increase the amount of debris extruded beyond the apex and, consequently, the risk of postoperative pain. The goal of the present study was to evaluate and compare postoperative pain using three different nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques: a rotary crown-down technique using TF instruments (SybronEndo, Orange, Ca), a reciprocating single-file technique using WaveOne instruments (Maillefer DEntsply, Baillagues, CH), and a novel instrumentation technique (TF Adaptive, SybronEndo, Orange, Ca), using a unique, proprietary movement, combining reciprocation and continuous rotation.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom