State violence, empire, and the figure of the “soldier‐victim” in Northern Ireland

This article examines some of the deeper meanings of the denial of accountability in killings perpetrated by British soldiers during the conflict in Northern Ireland, as part of the debate on how to deal with the legacy of the past. It investigates the ways in which such “soldier‐perpetrators” are turned, instead, into “soldier‐victims” and asks what this tells us about the political culture that shapes such a response. In part, it will be argued, this is the product of a longer term Manichean distinction, deeply embedded in the history of empire and its wars, between “civilians” and “barbarians.” Here lawfulness, as a mark of “civility,” is identified with the self‐image of the (post‐) imperial state, contrasted with the unlawful chaos of the barbarian “Other.” In the context of both the counterinsurgency wars of the late 20th and early 21st century, and amid a presiding mood of “post‐imperial melancholia” and “heroic failure”, the figure of the “soldier‐victim,” therefore, becomes a means to turn the wrongs of state violence into an ideological potent imaginary of empire, the state (and its agents) as themselves those who have been wronged.