Clinicopathologic update of calcium oxalate in breast: A 15‐year retrospective review

Abstract Mammary malignancies are radiologically detected by presence of masses, architectural distortions or microcalcifications. Unlike calcium hydroxyapatite, calcium oxalate (CaOx) deposits have been almost exclusively associated with benign mammary processes. The etiology and mechanism of mammary CaOx deposition remains poorly understood, and the original studies elucidating its histopathologic correlation are dated several decades ago. We reviewed radiopathologic findings of breast biopsies and excisions to re‐examine the clinicopathologic significance of CaOx deposits and to ascertain potential radiologic characteristics for their identification. Fifty patients from 2004 to 2019 with reported “calcium oxalate” were retrospectively reviewed. CaOx was invariably detected with histopathologic changes of nonproliferative ducts/cysts (90%, 45 of 50), and less commonly, ducts/cysts with usual ductal hyperplasia (10%, 5 of 50). CaOx was missed on one biopsy with a subsequent excision showing apocrine cyst with CaOx. Despite the benign pathological findings, mammographic findings corresponding to CaOx ranged from benign to highly suspicious with 20% categorized as benign (round or punctuate), 22% as intermediate amorphous, 14% as suspicious (coarse/heterogeneous), and 18% as highly suspicious/pleomorphic, respectively. Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) was present in separate fields from CaOx containing benign ducts in two cases which were radiologically characterized as “grouped heterogeneous” and “localized linear.” On imaging, more than half of the cases (52.5%) had a corresponding BI‐RADS score of 4 and the calcifications were associated with variable distributions and appearances. In conclusion, this is one of the largest studies of CaOx in breast with radiology and pathology correlation. The radiologic appearances of CaOx are nonspecific from benign to highly suspicious. Identification of CaOx on the biopsy is reassuring for a benign diagnosis. Incidental atypical lesions can occur that are often not directly associated with CaOx. CaOx may be overlooked on pathologic evaluation which results in unnecessary surgery. Our findings support close radiologic–pathologic correlation for clinical decision‐making pertaining to breast calcifications.