z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Composite Pain Index: Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity of a Patient‐Reported Outcome for Research
Author(s) -
Wilkie Diana J.,
Molokie Robert E.,
Suarez Marie L.,
Ezenwa Miriam O.,
Wang Zaijie J.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
pain medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.893
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1526-4637
pISSN - 1526-2375
DOI - 10.1111/pme.12703
Subject(s) - medicine , physical therapy , cancer pain , mcgill pain questionnaire , schmidt sting pain index , population , test (biology) , reliability (semiconductor) , randomized controlled trial , visual analogue scale , cancer , paleontology , power (physics) , physics , environmental health , quantum mechanics , biology
Abstract Objective A single score that represents the multidimensionality of pain would be an innovation for patient‐reported outcomes. Our aim was to determine the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Composite Pain Index (CPI). Design Methodological analysis of data from a randomized controlled, pretest/post‐test education‐based intervention study. Setting The study was conducted in outpatient oncology clinics. Subjects The 176 subjects had pain, were 52 ± 12.5 years on average, 63% were female, and 46% had stage IV cancers. Methods We generated the CPI from pain location, intensity, quality, and pattern scores measured with an electronic version of Melzack's McGill Pain Questionnaire. Results The internal consistency values for the individual scores comprising the CPI were adequate (0.71 baseline, 0.69 post‐test). Principal components analysis extracted one factor with an eigenvalue of 2.17 with explained variance of 54% at baseline and replicated the one factor with an eigenvalue of 2.11 at post‐test. The factor loadings for location, intensity, quality, and pattern were 0.65, 0.71, 0.85, and 0.71, respectively (baseline), and 0.59, 0.81, 0.84, and 0.63, respectively (post‐test). The CPI was sensitive to an education intervention effect. Conclusions Findings support the CPI as a score that integrates the multidimensional pain experience in people with cancer. It could be used as a patient‐reported outcome measure to quantify the complexity of pain in clinical research and population studies of cancer pain and studied for relevance in other pain populations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here