
Intermittent Epidural vs Continuous Wound Infusion of Ropivacaine for Acute and Chronic Pain Control after Hysterectomy or Myomectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Author(s) -
Fassoulaki Argyro,
Chassiakos Dimitris,
Melemeni Aikaterini
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
pain medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.893
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1526-4637
pISSN - 1526-2375
DOI - 10.1111/pme.12523
Subject(s) - medicine , ropivacaine , anesthesia , randomized controlled trial , hysterectomy , continuous infusion , postoperative pain , pain control , surgery , chronic pain , physical therapy
Objective Adequate postoperative analgesia may enhance recovery. The efficacy of continuous wound infusion vs intermittent epidural ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia was investigated. Design Prospective randomized, observer blind trial. Setting A retaieio U niversity H ospital. Subjects Patients scheduled for open abdominal hysterectomy or myomectomy. Methods Patients received 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine along the skin incision before skin closure, followed by wound infusion 2 mL/hour of 0.375% ropivacaine or epidurally 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine in the beginning of surgery followed by 10 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine 6 hourly. The epidural injections or the wound infusion of ropivacaine lasted 48 hours. Rescue analgesia consisted of patient‐controlled analgesia morphine up to 48 hours and acetaminophen/codeine tablets the next 24 hours. Analgesic consumption and visual analog scale pain at rest and during cough were assessed 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. One and three months later, patients were interviewed by phone for analgesic consumption at home and presence of pain. Results The subcutaneous group consumed more morphine during the first 2, 4, and 8 hours postoperatively ( P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Subsequent morphine and acetaminophen/codeine requirements did not differ between the two groups. Pain intensity during cough was higher only 2 hours after surgery in the subcutaneous group ( P = 0.002). Three months postoperatively, the two groups did not differ in the analgesic requirements and presence of persisting and/or burning pain. Conclusion Based on our results, there is no clinical significant difference between the epidural ropivacaine and the subcutaneous ropivacaine group or a clear superiority to one management strategy.